First Communion
True CommunionThe Roman Catholic Church is occasionally criticized for clarifying that Protestants will have to not partake of Holy Communion at Mass. There are substantial doctrinal divergences amid Catholics and Protestants as regards not only Holy Communion but also the aim of the Mass. Stated simply, Catholics believe that the bread and wine served as Holy Communion is mysteriously transformed into the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharistic Liturgy for the duration of Mass. The Eucharist is the sacramental celebration of the Paschal Mystery. Holy Communion is the culmination of the Eucharistic Liturgy. Holy Communion is also referred to in Catholic terminology as the Real Presence (the instructing that Jesus Christ is present at and in the Eucharist in his body and blood, humanity and divinity, underneath the form of bread and wine)Protestants, in general speaking, do not percentage in this belief—at least not doctrinally. All Protestants do not hold the same faith as regards Holy Communion. Some Christians maintain beliefs that are more similar to that of the Church-- such as Lutherans--, while others maintain beliefs that are much further got rid of from Catholic beliefs--such as Baptists. For intents of this essay I will not talk about the varying theological positions except to say that no other ecclesial community or church—save perchance the Eastern Orthodox—hold to a theory of Holy Communion that is identical with the Church. Consequently, Catholics and Protestants plainly disagree on the Christological significations of Holy Communion. Logic then insists that if there is disagreement over the very nature of Holy Communion there is, in actuality, no unity of belief, and hence no “communion” in the true sense of the word. Many non-Catholics are proponents of the conception of intercommunion i.e., communion that is open to all confessing Christians no matter of their queer denominational affiliation. The Church concludes that intercommunion is a contradiction, as it does not represent unfeigned communion. The Roman Catholic Church is not the only church that exercises closed communion. The Eastern Orthodox Church as well as sure Protestant churches such as Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod exercise closed communion. Without addressing the precise substantive reasons that these groups exercise closed communion, it may be assumed that these groups and the Church maintain similar procedural reasons for doing so.A normally indicated sentiment by those discouraged from receiving Holy Communion prior to being “in communion” with the Church, is that they are being unfairly shut out of this “universal” sacrament. The argument runs that if a person genuinely believes that Jesus is calling him or her to partake in Holy Communion, he or she must be capable to do so disregarding of his or her queer Christian belief. “Communion is communion,” they say, and “who are you to deny a believer the right to partake in Holy Communion?” Egalitarian impulses may lead one to take umbrage at being shut out of the supposedly universal sacrament of Holy Communion. But is such reaction consistent with right reason? Is it not plausible the “unfairness” we sense is not accurately “unfairness” but rather a feeling of annoyance at being hindered or criticized symptomatic of our lack of unity of belief? And is it not evenly plausible that when we promote intercommunion we lessen the chances that Christian unity will be realized because of a lack of “true communion” amidst Christians? Before we commence to answer these questions we must initial explore incisively what is meant when we use the term “communion”. Webster’s Dictionary defines communion as “an act or instance of sharing.” This definition in turn gives rise to the definition of communion which distinctively incorporates the Christian definition of the sacrament of Holy Communion. But to define communion in such a manner is to engage in a sure degree of tautology and is exclusively unsatisfactory. Therefore to comprehend quintessentially what we mean when we use the term “communion” we will have to employ a heap of hermeneutical principles in order to draw forth from our shared Judeo-Christian history the true meaning of “communion.” Examining the etymology of the word “communion” we find that it is translated from the Greekkoinonia. Koinoinia can be specified as a cooperative relationship or fellowship. Importantly, koinonia is used nineteen times in most editions of the Greek New Testament. For present purposes, the most necessary usage of the word in the New Testament is in 1 Corinthians 10:16 (KJV) wherein the English word “communion” is used to represent koinonia. Specifically, St. Paul states "the cup of benediction which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? Because there is one loaf, we who are many, are one body, for we all partake of one loaf." For much of the English speaking world the King James Version of the Bible was the important translation of the Bible in use for almost 400 years. As a result, it is likely that the vernacular of the term “communion” is derivative of the King James Version. This is significant because the language St. Paul uses is undeniably Christological. He speaks not of symbols, but rather uses a word that invokes a cooperative relationship or fellowship with both the body and blood of Christ. In the opening clause of 1 Corinthians 10:16 St. Paul says not one thing of fellowship or fundamental interaction with other Christians; rather, he is speaking specifically of the kinship amidst the believer and the Lord, and how the two are joined by the consuming of the bread and wine. In the words spoken without delay following he states that this fellowship must not only be personal but in partaking of the communion with the body and blood of Christ we inevitably become one with each other at the same time we become one with Christ. Read in context this passage makes clear that there is both a personal and a social aspect of communion—both are necessary elements of the sacramental whole. Both are necessary for believers to be fulfilled and/or finished in the divine corpus in which they believe. One can not make an analyzation of the etymology of the word “communion” and ignore the context in which the word gained currency. Any try at a mutual understanding of what is meant by the term “communion” will have to inevitably assume that most Christians (and for that matter non-Christians) perceive communion in light of the Greek word koinoinia. Thus the English term “communion” has a direct linguistic kinship to the Lord’s Supper instituted by Christ, and while the term may surely have a secular meaning it is more than likely pregnant with a specific Christian meaning. Possibly most crucial of all is the fact that the term holds a historical, scriptural, and sacramental element which incorporates all Christians into one body through the act of consuming bread and wine in a sacramental context. Thus St. Paul is speaking of a “true communion,” and in doing so is passing on to the people of Corinth what the Apostles had learned in regards to the Holy Communion from Jesus Christ himself. But what precisely is “true communion?” Although the term “true communion” is not expressly specified by the Church, the teachings of the Church on Holy Communion distinctly demonstrate a consistent de facto understanding of “true communion.” Stated simply, the definition of unfeigned communion requires that the communicants agree on the nature of that which is to be celebrated. Therefore, if Protestants (or Catholics for that matter) think that the bread and wine stay merely bread and wine all around a Mass (or church service) there is not plainly a divergence of opinion but a rudimentary disagreement on doctrinal teachings. One cannot have a rudimentary disagreement on the nature of Holy Communion and still maintain that there is true communion. This is in fact what Scripture teaches. St. Paul states in no uncertain terms that Christ is calling all Christians to unity, and most Christians believe that Christ does without doubt will Christian unity. All are in agreement that we do not yet have Christian unity. And, one of the more significant—if not the most significant—area in which Christians are not merged surrounds the meaning of Holy Communion. If there is no unity of belief, and no “true communion,” denying and/or ignoring the divergence of faith does not heal the frustration. When Protestants seek to partake of Holy Communion at a Catholic Mass with no desire for unfeigned communion, an inherent contradiction occurs which the Church can not endorse or deny. Hopefully, once one gets past the umbrage of being “left out,” one may inquire a little deeper and ask the question “why is this conception of true communion so important to the Catholic Church?” It is insufficient to answer that non-Catholics have no right to demand concessions of a Catholic sacrament. Such an answer is neither going to persuade anybody nor even to the full or entire extent explain the reasons behind the Church’s position. Thus there will never be “true communion” if Catholics merely retort with “that’s the way it is - take it or leave it.” In order to fulfill Christ’s admonition that “we all be one,” we will have to be competent to explain what we believe and why we believe. Thereafter we ought to talk about these beliefs with each other with honestness and most significantly with charity. To do anything less is to be less than what Christ is calling us all to be. So how now ought to Catholics explain the conception of “true communion” and it is importance to the Church? Let’s look basi to the manner in which the Church views her role in humane history and her longing for Christian reunification. Christ’s plea for unity in St. John’s Gospel at 12:21 is central to this analysis. The Blessed Disciple writes that Jesus said “that they all may be one, as thou, Father in me, and I in Thee; that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.” The Church maintains that “Christ bestowed unity on his Church from the beginning…and that Christ always gives his Church the gift of unity, but that the Church will have to always pray and work to maintain, reinforce, and perfective the unity that Christ wills for her.” Catechism of the Catholic Church, 820. Pope Benedict not long back wrote that “sacramental ‘mysticism’ is social in character, for in sacramental communion I become one with the Lord, like all other communicants. As St. Paul says “Because there is one bread, we who are a great deal of are one body, for we partake of one bread.” (1 Cor 10:17). Union with Christ is also union with all those to whom he gives himself……Communion draws me out of myself towards him, and therefore towards unity with all Christians.” Benedict XVI, Deus Est Caritas. The desire to recover the unity of all Christians is a gift of Christ and a call of the Holy Spirit. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 280. The Church’s mission is to forward the cause of unity in order that all Christians are “partaking of one bread.” It does so, however, on Christ’s terms, as practiced by His Church since the Last Supper. The consecrated bread and wine is mysteriously transformed into the actual body and blood of Christ. Specifically, Catholics believe that in order for the standard bread and wine to become the body and blood of Christ, a duly ordained priest is necessary to fetch when it comes to this transubstantiation. No layperson has the power to effect this change. Technically speaking when the priest is celebrating the Eucharist he is acting in persona Christi—or in the person of Christ. Interestingly enough, Martin Luther in truth believed in the Real Presence; he just could not agree that the Catholic priest was the instrument of the transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. Succeeding generations of Protestants, however, have moved further and further away from Luther and now arguably only the Lutherans and the Anglicans believe in anything that approaches the Catholic faith in the Real Presence. Consequently, most Protestants see Holy Communion only as a symbol and do not believe that the preacher or the pastor has any power to effect a mysterious modify to the ordinary items of bread and wine. The priest has the power to act in persona Christi precisely because of the ecclesiological position into which he has been ordained in the Roman Catholic Church. As successors to the Apostles, the bishops (and by extension the priests) of the Roman Catholic Church have the right and obligation to celebrate the Eucharist instituted by Christ. The celebration of the Eucharist is the crucial focus of a priest’s life. The intention of the Mass (what Protestants might refer to as a church service) is not a self-affirming homily or a fire and brimstone sermon; rather, it is to unite the ordinary Catholic in the pew with Jesus Christ in the company of his fellow believers. Whereas a lot of Protestants judge the effectiveness of a church service by the emotions or reasoning that is generated by the singing and the preaching, the Church sees these as modest compliments to the main aim of the “church service” viz. Holy Communion. Stated simply, Roman Catholics believe that the Eucharist (of which Holy Communion is the liturgical culmination) is the “source and summit of the life and mission of the Church.” A well-intentioned Protestant might ask for the Scriptural basis upon which the Church make such a claim. In fact, Catholic faith in the Real Presence is based on the historical exercise of the early Church and Christ’s rather clear commandment in the Gospel of St. John, wherein the Lord states You may have no life in yourselves, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood. The man who eats my flesh and drinks my blood enjoys eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. My flesh is real food, my blood is real drink. He who eats my flesh, and drinks my blood, lives continually in me, and I in him. Jesus then put this faith into exercise when he instituted Holy Communion at the Last Supper. Wherein at Luke 22:19 Jesus states “Then he took the bread, and blessed and broke it, and gave it to them saying “This is my body, given for you, do this for a commemoration of me”. The Roman Catholic Church—as well as the Orthodox community-- has held basically the same faith with regards to Holy Communion since the 1st century. We recognise for sure that St. Ignatius of Antioch in 110 A.D. said of those who hold heterodox views that “they refrain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which flesh suffered for our sins and which the Father, in his goodness raised up again.” Also, St. Justin Martyr writing in the mid-2nd century said For we do not receive these things as mutual bread or mutual drink; but as Jesus Christ our Savior being incarnate by God’s Word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise we have been taught that the feed consecrated by the Word of prayer which comes from him, from which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation, is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus; and We call this feed Eucharist; and no one else is permitted to partake of it, except one who believes our instructing to be true… And then there are the remarks of St. Athanasius’, who in the 4th century closely single-handedly fought off the Arian heresy ( heresy which refused the Trinity), when he states: So long as prayers of supplication and entreaties have not been made there is only bread and wine. But after the outstanding and wondrous prayers have been completed, then the bread is become the Body, and the wine the Blood, of our Lord Jesus Christ. And again, Let us approach the celebration of the mysteries. This bread and wine, so long as the prayers and supplication have not taken place, stay merely what they are. But after the outstanding prayers and supplication have been set forth, the Word comes down into the bread and wine—and therefore His Body is confected. It is important to note that these Early Church Fathers cited above were responsible for transmitting, formulating, and defending—sometimes unto death--many of the dogmatic beliefs that Protestants and Catholics both hold in common. Catholics and Protestants paper over a substantial issue when we pretend that we have a similar exegesis. In fact, we do not have full, unfeigned communion of faith and to act other than as supposed or expected vitiates our professed beliefs. Whether it is a symbol or the actual body and blood of Christ is thence not a detail that may be permitted to be “fudged” just to protect our ecumenical sensibilities. Pope Benedict said as much when he wrote: It is not for us to act as if there were unity where this is not the case. The Eucharist is never a means we may use to any end; it is the gift of the Lord, the heart of the Church herself, and not within our control. It is not a matter of personal friendship here, of the subjective faith, which in any case we have no means of measuring, but of standing within the unity of the one Church and of our humbly waiting for God to concede unity himself. “The Eucharist is a Sacrifice, the formally presenting something of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross.” Raztinger, God is Near Us, 44. When faith in the Real Presence is forsaken, the intention of Holy Communion is inverted—and is inverted in homocentric manner. Removing the Real Presence from Holy Communion leads ineluctably to a diminution in the understanding of the sacrifice made on Calvary. For Catholics, therefore, Holy Communion is not plainly a means to worshipping God; rather, Holy Communion is the end to which we are called upon to aspire in justly ordered worship. Holy Communion is not plainly a vehicle of worship; rather, it is in fact the celebration of God’s gift to man in his son Jesus Christ. Since Holy Communion is God’s gift to man, we distort it is meaning when we view it as no more than another manner in which to worship God. It is so much more than that. For Catholics, the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is where time and eternity meet, and as such Catholics are called to celebrate the eternal sacrifice of Christ. A Catholic Mass is not plainly another “church service,” and by extension Holy Communion is not plainly a symbolic gesture or substitute form of worship—no matter how reverent, sincere, and heart-felt the gesture and faith may be.” So where does this leave the earnest Protestant who plainly wants to break bread with his Catholic brethren? Even after understanding the signification of the Church’s position on Holy Communion, he may still be desirous of partaking of Holy Communion while remaining Protestant. Some of these Christians may sense that the Church is “on to something” yet choose to stay outside the Church because of any number of reasons. Sometimes it is the divergences among Catholic culture and Protestant culture--and the attendant troubles that obtain when one converts from one to the other. Other times it is the attachment to their community that keeps people away from true communion with the Church. Whatever the reason, some times it is these people who are most nonplussed when discouraged from sharing in Holy Communion. Some even decry the instructing as being inconsistent with Jesus’ teachings, and yet another example of the “legalism” in the Church. The Church is not unsympathetic to their plight. In fact, she understands full well the attraction of her system of belief on Holy Communion precisely because she holds so dearly the system of belief of the Eucharist which maintains that Christ is made present at each Mass. (What Christian would not want to be in the presence of his Lord?) The Church grasps full well the pain precisely because she feels the painful rift within her body. It would be very easy for the Church, in an crusade to foster Christian unification, to permit non-Catholics who genuinely do believe in the Real Presence to partake of Holy Communion at Mass. But doing so would in the end in truth ruin the unity the Church seeks to promote, for were the Church to grant it, she would serve the inherent contradiction that actually destroys unity. History gives good counsel on the folly of this type of effort. The Reformation distinctly demonstrates the slippery slope that the Church would embark upon ought to she concede this type of syncretism. Martin Luther never meant to jettison the faith in the Real Presence but that is incisively what happened in sure Protestant denominations once the dogma of the Holy Eucharist was modified. The Church merely can not permit this to happen. She cannot do so for herself; she cannot do so for her lay faithful; and she can not do so for all non-Catholics. Non-Catholics who seek to part in Holy Communion with their Catholic brothers and sisters ought to realize that such untrue communion would in time diminish the eternal constituents of the Church that they find so beautiful in the original instance. It has been almost 500 years since the Reformation and probably now more than ever the Holy Spirit is reuniting Christians through the “longing and yearning” of scattered Christian souls who wish to enter into “true communion” with the Church. Just in the last ten years the Lutherans and the Catholics have been capable to sit down and come to significant agreement on the Real Presence in Holy Communion. The Holy Spirit is doing things in the name of Christian unification that would have been unthinkable just fifty years ago. Through the shared prayers of Catholics and Protestants alike, Christians everyplace are returning to the Church, and they are returning not because she has compromised her beliefs but precisely because she has not. And for those who have yet to be received back into the Church the very fact that there are more and more Christians who are moving back to a faith in the Real Presence is proof that the Church is rectify in calling for “true communion” and rejecting untrue communion. “True communion” is the light by which Christians are led back to the table of Christian unity. Only through true communion may we attain the goal of spiritual fulfillment, and only through “true communion” may we veritably be what Jesus Christ wishes for us—“ that they all may be one.”
NWT Beautiful White First Communion or Flower Girl Dress, 1st Communion Heart Locket Chain Included, First Communion Heart Locket Chain Included, Trolls- First Communion Troll Doll, Handmade Girl's Keepsake First Communion Rosary, Christopher Radko Blessed First Communion Hands Cup Bread 1015719 Ornament NWT, NEW THOMAS KINKADE A Child's Garden of Prayers Book First Holy Communion Gift?, *NEW IN BOX* FIRST COMMUNION GIFT SET WITH ROSARY AND MISSAL AND PIN, Childs First Holy Communion White Veil Girls Nylon Mesh Silk Floral Head Wear, Vintage 1950's First Holy Communion Girls Dress Pageant Wedding Flower Girl 10 ?, Estate Sterling First Communion Engravable Disc Charm, Girls First Communion Dress Size 7 By Posies Maine Battenburg Lace, NWT White Veil First communion Pearls Satin Trim Flower Girl Comb Included, Lenox SANDRA KUCK FIGURINES First Communion-Boy Brown Hair 8421498, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-PAGEANT SZ 5, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-PAGEANT SZ 7, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-PAGEANT-SZ 12, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-SZ 10 RARE EDITI, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-SZ 8 RTL $160.00, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-PAGEANT-SZ 8, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL-SZ 8 RARE EDITIO, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL SZ 8 RTL $160.00, NWT FIRST COMMUNION-EASTER-FLOWER GIRL SZ 7 RTL $160.00, FLOWER GIRL/FIRST HOLY COMMUNION COMPLETE OUTFIT SIZE 10 DRESS, Girls Easter 1st Communion Shoes 2.5, First Communion Flower Girl Bridal Lace Bow Rhinestones bridal wedding NEW, 1951's JESUS THE GOOD SHEPHERD 1st COMMUNION MEMENTO ITALIAN HOLY CARD, 1935's JESUS AND THE 1st COMMUNION MEMENTO NICE DIE CUT HOLY CARD, SWEETIE PIE First Communion Dress 385T White Size 6, TIP TOP First Communion Dress 5426X White Size 8, 1940's GUARDIAN ANGEL LOOKING AFTER A GIRL 1st COMMUNION ITALIAN HOLY CARD, My First Communion, Old Vintage Antique Photograph Little Girl First Holy Communion, The Bread of Life: Preparing for First Confession and First Communion Martin Edw, First Communion [VINYL] Gang Gang Dance Vinyl , Silver Finish 8x10, Holds 2-3x3 First Communion Frame, Religious Two PieceSet First Communion Rosary Box Gift , Religious New Black First Communion Keepsake Rosary, FIRST HOLY COMMUNION BOY SET 2012 NEW Mass Book Rosary R-Case Pin Scapular, FIRST COMMUNION STATUE JAPAN, First Communion Religious Cross Bracelet Jewelry Pearl, Lenox SANDRA KUCK FIRST COMMUNION-AFRICAN AMERICAN, New Girls White First Communion Dress Size 13/14 Flower Girl Dress Pageant Fancy, Precious Moments First Communion Figurine, New Girls White First Communion Dress Size 5/6 Flower Girl Dress Pageant Fancy, 1st Holy Communion Wish Gift Pin Card, Genuine Austrian Crystal, NEW [1139], 1st Communion CHALICE Rosary Center & Our Father Beads for Rosaries, FIRST COMMUNION, girl, religious premade scrapbook pages paper piecing, ANTIQUE GERMAN SILVER HEART CHERUB ANGEL CHARM ~ 1st COMMUNION w/ Orig. Box, Joseph's Studio 1st Communion Girl & Guardian Angel NIB, Lenox SANDRA KUCK FIGURINE First Communion Brunette, First Communion Headband Veil, With Rosettes, Pearls & Sequins~White, Antique Photograph Lot 2 First Communion 1935 Mother Daughter Signed Portrait, Precious Moments First Communion Cross great condition, VTG '59 FIRST 1ST COMMUNION VEIL EXCELLENT! ORIG. OWNER, STERLING SILVER FIRST / HOLY COMMUNION MEDAL AND STERLING SILVER NECKLACE, Wood Wall Divine Mercy Cross First Communion Gift W, 1987 ENESCO BLONDE GIRL PRAYING + BOY WITH BIBLE MY FIRST COMMUNION 1990 ROMAN, Child First Communion Rosary Bracelet SWAROVSKI CRYSTALS YOU PICK THE COLOR, PRECIOUS MOMENT-1st Communion Boy-FOR HIS PRECIOUS LOVE #0000364,
What are a great deal of good presents for a girls First Communion? Its my daughters First Communion Sunday and I don't recognise what to get her. I got my older daughter a bike for hers. She already had a iPod, bike, scooter, radio, iPod player, DS pearl jewelry, individualized Bible or book of prayers, a good deal of particular keepsake for her to do not forget this essential day. |
![First Communion [VINYL] Gang Gang Dance Vinyl](http://gospelcentermc.org/images/e/220950875299_0.jpg)
